•
• [ eng ] • [ fra ] • [ glg ] • [ por ] • [ spa ] •

•


• • • • •
• 1. D(.)
Rodrigo Anes
&
Brácaros
traduções		 • 2. Ervanária Maria de Fátima • 3. Profutur@(a; b; c; d; e)...
MAG(Litigation against *António de Almeida Pinheiro*, born on Tuesday, 21 May 1940, a native from Carpinteira, Melgaço (Portugal), natural son of Senhor Pinheiro, also native from there, also, against whom for he was adopted with a birth date preceding my father’s Henrique Almeida Braga by my paternal grandfather Américo Marques Braga, *he made believe to the whole society he was legitimate to assume the position of double head of legitimate family in the place of my father, who he is legitimate heir*, hiding his true origin, usurping then in conjunction with his age inside and outside of Portugal, family titles and properties to which my father, is entitled, using them as usurper for himself, his descendants and alliances to which for fear of truth he or they never invite those as I do not accept to be deceived, abusing of those feeble naive around them, from whom they abuse and take advantages, never consulting my father, legitimate heir of my paternal grandfather with obvious legal primacy over the adopted he his obtaining the properties in which my grandfather was born, lived or worked, in the sharing, restoration or purchase of any family property of legal ties because, he the adopted, disrespected the surnames Marques Braga, Braga or Marques, that partially or wholly he or they use for himself, descendants and alliances, manipulative acquisitions in contempt despair of my father's interests and obviously mine in consequence. + Litigation against *Nádia Alexandra *, daughter of unknown father (pretending to be born on Tuesday, February 14, 1983 in Cascais*), usurper of the bond my mother made to me in regards of my prior expressed succession right for the formalization of the sale or purchase pretension related to my mother’s appartement in Lavradio (Lisbon area), rejecting or cancelling to other than mine the attribution of the denounced purchase as unlawful, for disrespecting the referred right I conduct in my exclusive own pre notarial intermediation with legitimate purpose in referred right I have and she does not in my mother’s 93 MARIA LALANDE STREET 1 D, LAVRADIO PT-15 28350-0001, Portugal property, therefore my respective recovery of the furniture I there possess. + Litigation against *the offspring of my maternal grandmother Aurora of the Pleasures Delgado Botelho*, popularly known by the majority as Aurora Delgado, for being usurpers, except my mother who expressed not to be wanting anything I own, firstly for they didn’t convey me the promissory note titled in exclusive names of mine and hers, possessed by my referred grandmother, probably in recognition of my volunteer services with or without my parents presence, alone most of the time with or for maternal grandparents in their house in Tinhela inside their own housed so called tavern, with all patented commercial activities, offfically started in 1929, or in their village excentered surrounding lands or by representation in Chaves, Portugal for local providers products acquisition which therefore reason constituted by the hands of my referred maternal grandmother the insight divulgation of referred claimed document in former named Banco Pinto & Sotto Mayor, present Portuguese Commercial Bank account, then and now in Chaves, Portugal in which city I first basic education dispensed and have been later on and still owning my home up to date…; secondly because they didn’t pay the due I claim from the father of my maternal grandmother, António Augusto Cavães Botelho, born in Chaves, Portugal and died in Brazil, as she refused it, and as my mother expressed me also not being interested in this matter or any of my possession, I own or should own, in the loving and respectful memory of my grandparents for which or whom I shall pursue either of those who have stolen my little boy kinetic mechanical house parked car before its ground zero happening testimony, those moreover who stole the original very first contemporary testimony on their home living by the action of the photograph I have been since then without a single advisory or even a source quotation I deserve, those who refused to share with me my father’s due dependences, those who do not respect the legitimate hierarchy and therefore respective legal order of titles, assets, heritage or even express an observed contemplation for most spoilt heir in general, better said despite of my father’s rights, either of those who promote drugs ou cognitive limitations, abuses to my mother, conflicts of interest or contraproductive actions against my parents or I as per consequence.)A		 • 4.
 • 5.
 •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 6. • 7. • 8. • 9. • 10. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 11. • 12. • 13. • 14. • 15. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 16. • 17. • 18. • 19. • 20. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 21. • 22. • 23. • 24. • 25. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 26. • 27. • 28. • 29. • 30.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 31. • 32. • 33. • 37. • 38. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 39. • 40. • 41. • 42. • 43. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 44. • 45. • 46. • 47. • 65.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 66. • 67. • 68. • 69. • 70.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 71. • 77. • 78. • 88. • 89. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 90. • 91. • 92. • 93. • 135.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 136. • 137. • 138. • 139. • 141. •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 142. • 176. • 177. • 178. • 179.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 180. • 181. • 182. • 183. • 184.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 185. • 186. • 187. • 188. • 189.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 190. • 191. • 336. • 337. • 368.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 369. • 370. • 371. • 738. • 739.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 740. • 741. • 742. • 743. • 1472.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 1473. • 1474. • 1475. • 1476. • 1477.
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail
• 1478. • 1479. • Quis prØxima? •
Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail Blog • E-mail


• •  • • • • • • •

eFax: +33.(0)9.56.65.97.32 • UTC±00:00: (Portugal +351) 911.118.582

© D(.) Rodrigo Anes & Brácaros Lobbying